This confuses the hell out of me.
Death at a Funeral (2007) was an absolutely brilliant British film by director Frank Oz. The story was fantastic. The characters impeccable. The comedic timing bang on. So why on earth do the American's have to remake it? I've never been much of a fan of typical 'American' humour. But there are a few American films that I have enjoyed and some British films I have not enjoyed so I am not totally biased. But Death at a Funeral was such a British film. The script was British. The setting was British. The characters were inescapably British. It worked because it was British. From what I've read of the 2010 American remake I'm sure it will make a complete mockery of the whole thing. Chris Rock and Martin Lawrence? Really? They can be hilarious in their respective comedic fields, but this story doesn't lend itself to their slap stick style. If you've seen the 2007 version you know none of the characters were outwardly funny. The script wasn't necessarily 'comedic', rather the comedy was hidden in the events and circumstances surrounding this family.
I think this remake will be a cheap version of the original. The subtlety and comedic artistry of the first movie will be replaced by mediocrity and cheesy lines in the second.
If you like smart comedy watch the original.
If you want a crappy American flick... it's out later this year.
x.